Friday, May 11, 2012
Turns out, it TOTALLY lives up to the hype.
You don't need the back stories on the characters--there's just enough expository dialogue to clue you in. Speaking of dialogue, it's crisp and witty with the quips and wisecracks flowing as fast and furious as the action sequences. This was definitely one of the funniest and funnest movies I've seen this year.
Makes that "in years."
Although Robert Downey, Jr. is in fine form as "genius, billionaire, playboy, philanthropist" Tony Stark aka "Iron Man," he's not the only one eliciting laughs from the audience. For my money, the best character was Mark Ruffalo's soft spoken Bruce Banner turned raging green Hulk. Indeed, "Hulk, smash!" has become a internet meme and justifiably so.
My only gripe: casting Agent Phil Coulson as "The Gipper." Sure, Clark Gregg offers a likeable portrayal, but the idea that somehow this nerdy agent's death--rather than the death of hundreds of innocent people and the annihilation of the planet--is the catalyst for the disparate group of superheroes joining forces was...lame. Whatever. The movie still rocked!
I have to say I LOVED this movie. I may even see it again.
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
I'm a sucker for costumes AND John Cusack, so I thought that the combination of the two would make for an entertaining couple of hours. Although Cusack's portrayal of Edgar Allan Poe isn't quite as awful as reviews seem to indicate, despite the physical resemblance, he doesn't really own the role. This is partially due to the writing which have him spouting exposition and dropping Wikipedia tidbits rather than depicting a flesh and blood person.
Speaking of blood, there's plenty of it in this gothic horror. A trio of murders kick off the action immediately--emulating Poe's macabre style. As gruesome as the murders are, however, they do little to inspire a sense of horror or establish the tone of the psychological thriller. The tone that is set is not gripping but conveys more of a sense of the somnambulant. In fact, one of my fellow audience members snored throughout most of the film. (It's possible that the snoozy movie-goer was this Gawker reviewer, but I wouldn't be surprised to learn that others were bored by the film...)
Adhering to period verisimilitude doesn't appear to have been a major concern for the filmmakers. The story opens with hoofs pounding down a Baltimore cobblestone street as the police department races to an apartment building to stop a violent crime (as evidenced by the screams and pleas of a woman's voice) in progress. Clearly a neighbor must have heard the commotion and dialed 911 on his iPhone.
Oh wait...no phones (iPhone or otherwise) in 1849.
The film also kills off one of Poe's rivals--despite the fact that in real life he lived to write a scathing obituary of the poet/writer.
There are those who derided the "twist" as to who turns out to be the copycat killer, but that didn't really bother me much. What I found unappealing about the movie was that the murders--while certainly grisly and gruesome and gory--didn't resonate as "Poe-tic" to me. I did a paper on the writer in high school and while I don't have a vivid recollection of his work, I did note that the necrophiliac themes were pervasive--even perverse at times. While the film did hint at Poe's affinity for the repellant, Cusack's portrayal was more of a quirky eccentric (complete with pet raccoon) than a twisted, tortured soul.
Like one of Poe's most famous stories, The Tell-Tale Heart, The Raven is meant to be a bit of a mindfuck--at least on the part of the killer toying with the object of his homage. Unlike that gothic classic, however, the movie does little to build suspense and tension and the climax is less of a shattering revelation and more of a tired whimper.